宏福苑大火時間線Wang Fuk Court fire timeline

失效的防線為什麼宏福苑大火會發生Failed Lines of DefenceWhy the Wang Fuk Court Fire Happened

宏福苑大火揭露了儘管應有的監管制度都存在，但當危險逐步累積，卻沒有任何一道防線成功阻止火災。這個資料庫保存了一系列紀錄，顯示招標程序的問題、居民對工程安排的質疑、材料的風險、監管如何失效，到 2025 年 11 月 26 日的災難，以至災後迅速展開的公民行動。

The Wang Fuk Court fire revealed that even though regulatory systems existed on paper, not a single line of defence succeeded in stopping the disaster as hazards gradually mounted. This database preserves a series of records tracing the issues with tendering procedures, residents’ concerns regarding project arrangements, material hazards, regulatory failures, the catastrophe of 26 November 2025, and the rapid civic mobilisation that followed.

正在閱讀Viewing01 / 06

捲動探索Scroll to explore

時間線Timeline

強制驗樓Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme

大埔宏福苑於2016年6月10日接獲房屋局獨立審查組發出的強制驗樓法定通知。制度本來是為了保障樓宇安全，但這卻正正是大火的遠因。

工程高度依賴業主立案法團聘請的專業顧問公司來進行，但很多住戶都不清楚屋苑哪些部分必須維修，以及不了解監督修葺顧問公司的職責。然而，逾七成人表示監督顧問的費用不應該多於80萬港元，為業界市價大約一半。2019年1月，六成業權份數通過聘任鴻毅建築師有限公司來進行樓宇勘察。同年10月，鴻毅僅以22萬港元低價完成8座大樓檢驗工作。

On 10 June 2016, Wang Fuk Court in Tai Po received a statutory notice under the Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme issued by the Independent Checking Unit of the Housing Bureau. Whilst the scheme was originally intended to ensure building safety, it ultimately became a remote cause of the disaster.

The works relied heavily on a professional consultancy firm appointed by the Incorporated Owners of Wang Fuk Court (IO). However, many residents were unclear about which parts of the estate required mandatory repairs and did not understand the supervisory duties of the repair consultant. Over 70% of respondents stated that the consultancy fee should not exceed HK$800,000, about half the going market rate. In January 2019, 60% of the estate’s shares of ownership voted to appoint Will Power Architects Company Limited to carry out the building survey. In October of that year, Will Power completed the inspection of all eight residential blocks for a remarkably low fee of just HK$220,000.

低價中標、天價工程Low-Ball Bids and Exorbitant Works Costs

宏福苑需要聘請顧問公司來監督大維修，鴻毅在2021年12月僅以30.8萬港元低價中標，遠遠低於市價。2024年1月，宏福苑業主立案法團於特別業主大會正式通過以約3.3億港元天價批出大維修工程，並揀選宏業建築工程有限公司為承建商，每戶需分攤約15萬至19萬港元。高昂造價引發居民強烈質疑涉嫌「圍標」與黑箱作業。授權過程亦出現重大爭議，包括有報道指大埔區議員兼宏福苑前法團顧問黃碧嬌所屬團隊收取的多張授權票中，至少有三張疑似來自已經離世的業主，亦有被授權業主稱不認識黃碧嬌團隊的義工。

與此同時，在《香港國安法》下，民主派政黨、公民社會、獨立傳媒大幅萎縮，也令居民更難透過社會力量去阻止工程。

Wang Fuk Court needed to engage a consultancy firm to supervise the major maintenance works. In December 2021, Will Power won the contract with an ultra-low tender of HK$308,000, far below market rates. In January 2024, the IO passed a resolution at an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) formally awarding the major renovation contract for an exorbitant HK$330 million to Prestige Construction & Engineering Co. Limited, costing each household roughly HK$150,000 to HK$190,000.

The astronomical cost raised strong suspicions of bid-rigging and backroom dealings amongst residents. Severe controversies also arose surrounding the proxy voting process. Reports indicated that amongst the proxy forms collected by the team of Peggy Wong – a Tai Po District Councillor and former adviser to the Wang Fuk Court IO – at least three were suspected of belonging to deceased owners. In addition, several owners named on proxies claimed they did not recognise the volunteers from Wong Pik-kiu’s team.

At the same time, under the Hong Kong National Security Law, pro-democracy political parties, civil society, and independent media had drastically shrivelled, making it far more difficult for residents to harness societal power to halt the scheme.

居民嘗試阻止工程Residents’ Efforts to Halt the Works

2024年2月起，居民多次引用《建築物管理條例》收集 5% 業權聯署要求重選法團或擱置工程，但屢遭阻延。在一次2024年6月的法團大會，法團代表不容許業主旁聽會議，他們在會議前後包圍法團主席，要求他解釋為何要求居民要在六個半月內需繳付全數大維修款項。居民向民政事務署、屋宇署、廉政公署以及市區重建局等不同機構投訴，但多方未有實質執法行動。

Beginning in February 2024, residents repeatedly invoked the Building Management Ordinance to collect signatures representing 5% of ownership shares, demanding a re-election of the management committee or the suspension of the works; however, these efforts faced persistent obstruction and delays. At an IO meeting in June 2024, representatives barred flat owners from observing proceedings. Owners surrounded the IO chairman before and after the meeting, demanding an explanation as to why residents were being required to pay the full renovation sum within six and a half months. Residents lodged complaints with various authorities – including the Home Affairs Department, the Buildings Department, the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC), and the Urban Renewal Authority – yet none took substantive enforcement action.

工程風險繁多Accumulation of Construction Hazards

施工期間問題頻生：承建商本身具有多次勞工處與屋宇署違規紀錄，居民亦多次投訴工人在棚架吸煙。外牆鋪設大量未達防火標準的棚網、防水帆布，並使用高易燃性的發泡膠板封閉窗戶及大堂通風口以防塵防漏。不少很多後樓梯窗戶被拆除，改裝成俗稱「生口」的可燃木窗。

與此同時，屋宇署、勞工處及消防處等部門各自為政，在樓宇維修及地盤安全巡查上權責不清、互相轉介卻缺乏協同，導致監管漏洞。

Problems recurred frequently during construction. The contractor already had multiple compliance violation records with the Labour Department and Buildings Department, and residents repeatedly complained about workers smoking on the scaffolding. Substandard safety netting and waterproof tarpaulins that failed fire protection standards were fitted across the external walls. Highly flammable polystyrene (styrofoam) boards were used to seal windows and lobby vents for dust prevention and waterproofing. Numerous rear staircase windows were removed and replaced with flammable wooden makeshift covers.

Meanwhile, government bodies such as the Buildings Department, the Labour Department, and the Fire Services Department operated in silos. With blurred lines of responsibility and cross-departmental referrals without real synergy during inspections of building maintenance and site safety, regulatory loopholes were left wide open.

05 · 時期：2025年11月26日05 · Period: 26 November 2025

火災發生The Outbreak of the Fire

外牆搭棚物料起火，易燃防護網及發泡膠材料導致火勢在極短時間內沿竹棚「煙囪效應」向上及橫向迅速蔓延，波及多座大廈。大廈逃生窗戶被封死、地面走火通道堆滿雜物，消防救援極度受阻。樓宇內的火警鐘沒有響起，延遲了居民逃生。最終，火災導致168人死亡、79人受傷。災難中，共有至少 10 名外傭不幸喪生，許多人當時正留守家中照顧年邁或行動不便的僱主。隸屬沙田消防局、37歲的男消防員何偉豪亦不幸殉職。

Scaffolding materials on the external walls caught fire. Flammable protective netting and polystyrene sheets created a chimney effect along the bamboo scaffolding, causing the flames to sweep upward and laterally in an extremely short period, engulfing multiple blocks. Fire escape windows had been sealed shut and ground-level escape routes were obstructed with debris, severely hindering firefighting and rescue operations. Building fire alarms failed to sound, delaying resident evacuation. Ultimately, the fire claimed 168 lives and injured 79 people. At least 10 foreign domestic helpers were amongst the casualties, many of whom had stayed behind in the flats to care for elderly or mobility-impaired employers. Ho Wai-ho, a 37-year-old firefighter stationed at Sha Tin Fire Station, also tragically died in the line of duty.

168人死亡 · 79 人受傷lives lost · 79 injured

災後公民行動Post-Disaster Civic Action

時期：2025年11月26日至12月26日Period: 26 November — 26 December 2025

社區自救與支援Community mobilisation and support

公民社會迅速自救Civil society mobilised swiftly

宏福苑大火發生後，公民社會迅速自救。火災初期，即使社會情緒極為悲痛，大埔社區及全港市民展現出極強的民間動員力，自發建立物資站、臨時庇護點與情緒支援服務。此外，公民社會亦自發建立線上試算表，供受災者及家屬登記被困者的單位和狀況。大批市民自發前往宏福苑外圍及廣福休憩處排隊獻花及留下字條，排隊人龍一度長達 1.6 公里。

In the wake of the fire, civil society mobilised swiftly. Despite profound grief across the territory, the Tai Po community and the wider Hong Kong public demonstrated tremendous grassroots self-organisation during the initial phase, spontaneously establishing supply stations, temporary shelters, and emotional support services. Citizens created an online spreadsheet allowing victims and their families to register flat numbers and the status of trapped residents. Crowds gathered outside Wang Fuk Court and at Kwong Fuk Sitting-out Area to lay flowers and leave messages of condolence, forming queues that stretched up to 1.6 kilometres at their peak.

聯署、訴求與拘捕Petition, demands and arrests

四大訴求引發社會響應Four demands gained public traction

香港中文大學學生關靖豐等人與民間義工發起公民聯署，提出妥善安置災民、就工程疑涉利益輸送展開獨立調查、重新審視工程監管制度及問責成立獨立調查委員會四大訴求。該聯署行動在災後數日內迅速引發社會響應，但隨即觸動當局神經，警方國安處拘捕了關靖豐。除關靖豐外，民主派前區議員張錦雄及參與協助災民籌集物資的義工阿澄都被捕。時事評論員王岸然則被指在YouTube披露有關火災記者會「被取消」前遭國安警察約見的情況而被起訴，他亦被指控他發布具煽動意圖的影片。

Miles Kwan, a student at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, joined other civic volunteers to launch a petition presenting four key demands: proper rehousing of victims, an independent inquiry into suspected corruption and kickbacks, a comprehensive review of works supervision systems, and the establishment of an independent commission of inquiry to hold parties to account. The petition gained wide public traction within days, but quickly rattled the authorities. Officers from the National Security Department arrested Kwan. Former pro-democracy District Councillor Cheung Kam-hung and Ah Ching, a volunteer who had been assisting victims with relief supplies, were also arrested. Current affairs commentator Wong On-yin was charged for reportedly disclosing on YouTube that he had been questioned by National Security police before a press conference on the fire was forced to be cancelled; he was also accused of publishing seditious videos.

海外悼念Diaspora memorials

世界各地港人社群舉行悼念會Hong Kong communities held memorials worldwide

災後約十天，世界各地港人社群舉行悼念會。

Around ten days after the disaster, Hong Kong diaspora communities held memorial services across the world.

捲動推進時間線Scroll to move through the timeline

調查與追問Investigation and Inquiries

火災後，本地及海外媒體深入追查大火前因後果，重構事件來龍去脈，報道災民的故事。

獨立委員會的聆訊、警方以及廉政公署調查亦把散落於居民投訴、工程文件、部門巡查與消防問題之間的片段，重新組合成一套更全面的前因後果。

Following the disaster, local and overseas media pursued in-depth investigations into the causes and consequences of the fire, reconstructing the sequence of events and chronicling the stories of victims. Hearings by an independent committee, along with investigations by the police and the ICAC, began piecing together scattered fragments across resident complaints, engineering blueprints, departmental inspection records, and fire safety lapses to form a clearer, more comprehensive account of the disaster.

安置爭議Rehousing Controversies

如何安置宏福苑災民成為爭議。政府斥資約68億元收購受損座數，定案原址不建住宅改作公園，引來爭取原址重建的街坊強烈不滿；未遭焚毀的宏志閣初時被排除，更引發淪為孤島的抗議。補償雖設現金或「樓換樓」，但災民質疑選樓配額不明如「開盲盒」，亦憂補償不足以重置居所。加上搬遷過渡期緊迫，令安置過程充滿行政效率與人道關懷的矛盾。

The rehousing of Wang Fuk Court victims became a contentious issue. The government spent roughly HK$6.8 billion to acquire the damaged blocks, deciding not to rebuild residential units on-site and opting instead to turn the grounds into a public park. This sparked intense dissatisfaction amongst residents campaigning for on-site redevelopment. Wang Chi House, which was not gutted by the fire, was initially excluded from the scheme, prompting protests that the block was being abandoned as an isolated enclave.

Although compensation packages offered cash payouts or flat-for-flat swaps, victims criticised the allocation quotas as opaque and akin to “opening a blind box”, whilst worrying that financial compensation would be inadequate to purchase replacement homes. Compounded by tight relocation timetables, the rehousing process was fraught with friction between administrative efficiency and humanitarian care.

繼續探索Continue exploring

搜尋完整檔案Search the full archive

分別瀏覽資料來源與公民行動紀錄，繼續追查宏福苑大火的事件脈絡。

Explore source records and civic actions separately to continue tracing the Wang Fuk Court fire.

資料檢索Search sources 公民行動Civic actions